EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 2 (2026) Cahiers de l’IPa, 2 (2026) 3 Références
Open Access
Numéro
Cahiers de l’IPa
Volume 2, 2026
Open Quantum Many-Body Physics 2023
Numéro d'article 3
Nombre de pages 24
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cipa/202602003
Publié en ligne 17 mars 2026
  1. A.C. Potter, R. Vasseur, Entanglement Dynamics in Hybrid Quantum Circuits (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022), pp. 211–249, ISBN 978-3-031-03998-0, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03998-0_9 [Google Scholar]
  2. O. Lunt, J. Richter, A. Pal, Quantum Simulation Using Noisy Unitary Circuits and Measurements (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022), pp. 251–284, ISBN 978-3-031-03998-0, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03998-0_10 [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Degasperis, L. Fonda, G. Ghirardi. Does the lifetime of an unstable system depend on the measuring apparatus? Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970), 21, 471 (1974) [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Snizhko, P. Kumar, A. Romito. Quantum zeno effect appears in stages. Phys. Rev. Res., 2, 033512 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Biella, M. Schiró. Many-Body Quantum Zeno Effect and Measurement-Induced Subradiance Transition. Quantum, 5, 528 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Lami, A. Santini, M. Collura. Continuously monitored quantum systems beyond lindblad dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04108 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Li, X. Chen, A.W.W. Ludwig, M.P.A. Fisher. Conformal invariance and quantum nonlocality in critical hybrid circuits. Phys. Rev. B, 104, 104305 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Szyniszewski, A. Romito, H. Schomerus. Universality of entanglement transitions from stroboscopic to continuous measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125, 210602 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Li, X. Chen, M.P.A. Fisher. Quantum zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition. Phys. Rev. B, 98, 205136 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, J. Haah. Quantum entanglement growth under random unitary dynamics. Phys. Rev. X, 7, 031016 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, A. Nahum. Measurement-induced phase transitions in the dy-namics of entanglement. Phys. Rev. X, 9, 031009 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Bao, S. Choi, E. Altman. Theory of the phase transition in random unitary circuits with measurements. Phys. Rev. B, 101, 104301 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Chan, R.M. Nandkishore, M. Pretko, G. Smith. Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics. Phys. Rev. B, 99, 224307 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  14. X. Cao, A. Tilloy, A.D. Luca. Entanglement in a fermion chain under continuous mon-itoring. SciPost Phys., 7, 024 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Coppola, E. Tirrito, D. Karevski, M. Collura. Growth of entanglement entropy under local projective measurements. Phys. Rev. B, 105, 094303 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Russomanno, G. Piccitto, D. Rossini. Entanglement transitions and quantum bifur-cations under continuous long-range monitoring. Phys. Rev. B, 108, 104313 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Lumia, E. Tirrito, R. Fazio, M. Collura. Measurement-induced transitions beyond gaussianity: a single particle description. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09043 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Tirrito, A. Santini, R. Fazio, M. Collura. Full counting statistics as probe of measurement-induced transitions in the quantum Ising chain. SciPost Phys., 15, 096 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Piccitto, A. Russomanno, D. Rossini. Entanglement transitions in the quantum ising chain: A comparison between different unravelings of the same lindbladian. Phys. Rev. B, 105, 064305 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  20. J.C. Hoke, M. Ippoliti, D.A. Abanin, R. Acharya, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A.T. Asfaw, J. Atalaya, J.C. Bardin et al. Measurement-induced entanglement and telepor-tation on a noisy quantum processor. Nature, 622, 481 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  21. T.J. Elliott, W. Kozlowski, S.F. Caballero-Benitez, I.B. Mekhov. Multipartite entangled spatial modes of ultracold atoms generated and controlled by quantum measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114, 113604 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Noel, P. Niroula, D. Zhu, A. Risinger, L. Egan, D. Biswas, M. Cetina, A.V. Gorshkov, M.J. Gullans, D.A. Huse et al. Measurement-induced quantum phases realized in a trapped-ion quantum computer. Nature Physics, 18, 760 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Sierant, G. Chiriacò, F.M. Surace, S. Sharma, X. Turkeshi, M. Dalmonte, R. Fazio, G. Pagano. Dissipative Floquet Dynamics: from Steady State to Measurement Induced Criticality in Trapped-ion Chains. Quantum, 6, 638 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Fava, L. Piroli, T. Swann, D. Bernard, A. Nahum. Nonlinear sigma models for monitored dynamics of free fermions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.12820 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Giachetti, A. De Luca. Elusive phase transition in the replica limit of monitored systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.12166 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  26. P. Pöpperl, I.V. Gornyi, D.B. Saakian, O.M. Yevtushenko. Localization, fractality, and ergodicity in a monitored qubit. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01997 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  27. H. Ha, A. Pandey, S. Gopalakrishnan, D.A. Huse, Measurement-induced phase transi-tions in systems with diffusive dynamics (2024), 2405.08861 [Google Scholar]
  28. A.R. Negari, S. Sahu, T.H. Hsieh. Measurement-induced phase transitions in the toric code. Phys. Rev. B, 109, 125148 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  29. H.M. Wiseman, G.J. Milburn, Quantum Measurement and Control (Cambridge Univer-sity Press, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  30. J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Goldstine Printed Materials (Princeton University Press, 1955), ISBN 9780691028934 [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Aspelmeyer, T.J. Kippenberg, F. Marquardt. Cavity optomechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys., 86, 1391 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  32. R.B. Griffiths, Quantum Channels, Kraus Operators, POVMs (2010), https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:8114999 [Google Scholar]
  33. J.S. Bell. On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox. Physics Physique Fizika, 1, 195 (1964) [Google Scholar]
  34. C. Chou, H. Riedmatten, D. Felinto, S. Polyakov, S. van Enk, H. Kimble. Measurement-induced entanglement for excitation stored in remote atomic ensembles. Nature, 438, 828 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Hsu, Decoherence and quantum measurement: The missing lecture (2022) [Google Scholar]
  36. E. Bianchi, L. Hackl, M. Kieburg, M. Rigol, L. Vidmar. Volume-law entanglement entropy of typical pure quantum states. PRX Quantum, 3, 030201 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  37. J. Eisert, M. Cramer, M.B. Plenio. Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy. Rev. Mod. Phys., 82, 277 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  38. J.T. Chayes, L. Chayes, R. Durrett. Critical behavior of the two-dimensional first pas-sage time. Journal of statistical physics, 45, 933 (1986) [Google Scholar]
  39. A.A. Mele. Introduction to Haar Measure Tools in Quantum Information: A Beginner’s Tutorial. Quantum, 8, 1340 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  40. G. Köstenberger, Weingarten calculus (2021), 2101.00921 [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Stephen. Percolation problems and the potts model. Physics Letters A, 56, 149 (1976) [Google Scholar]
  42. S.J. Garratt, Z. Weinstein, E. Altman, Measurements conspire nonlocally to restructure critical quantum states (2022), 2207.09476 [Google Scholar]
  43. X. Feng, B. Skinner, A. Nahum. Measurement-induced phase transitions on dynamical quantum trees. PRX Quantum, 4, 030333 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  44. R. Wiersema, C. Zhou, J.F. Carrasquilla, Y.B. Kim. Measurement-induced entangle-ment phase transitions in variational quantum circuits. SciPost Phys., 14, 147 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  45. T.J. Hollowood, Renormalization Group and Fixed Points: in Quantum Field Theory (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013), ISBN 9783642363122, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36312-2 [Google Scholar]
  46. T. Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Oxford University Press, 2003), ISBN 9780198525004, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525004.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  47. F.D.M. Haldane. ’luttinger liquid theory’ of one-dimensional quantum fluids. i. prop-erties of the luttinger model and their extension to the general 1d interacting spinless fermi gas. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 14, 2585 (1981) [Google Scholar]
  48. A.O. Caldeira, A.J. Leggett. Influence of dissipation on quantum tunneling in macro-scopic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 46, 211 (1981) [Google Scholar]
  49. M. Cianciaruso, S.M. Giampaolo, W. Roga, G. Zonzo, M. Blasone, F. Illuminati, En-tanglement and quantum correlations in many-body systems: a unified approach via local unitary operations (2015), 1412.1054 [Google Scholar]
  50. S.K. Jian, C. Liu, X. Chen, B. Swingle, P. Zhang. Measurement-induced phase transi-tion in the monitored sachdev-ye-kitaev model. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127, 140601 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  51. T. Minato, K. Sugimoto, T. Kuwahara, K. Saito. Fate of measurement-induced phase transition in long-range interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 128, 010603 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  52. S. Aaronson. Quantum computing, postselection, and probabilistic polynomial-time. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 461, 3473–3482 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  53. J. Preskill. Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2, 79 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.