EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
Home (en) All issues Volume 2 (2026) Cahiers de l’IPa, 2 (2026) 3 References
Open Access
Issue
Cahiers de l’IPa
Volume 2, 2026
Open Quantum Many-Body Physics 2023
Article Number 3
Number of page(s) 24
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cipa/202602003
Published online 17 March 2026
  1. A.C. Potter, R. Vasseur, Entanglement Dynamics in Hybrid Quantum Circuits (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022), pp. 211–249, ISBN 978-3-031-03998-0, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03998-0_9 [Google Scholar]
  2. O. Lunt, J. Richter, A. Pal, Quantum Simulation Using Noisy Unitary Circuits and Measurements (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022), pp. 251–284, ISBN 978-3-031-03998-0, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03998-0_10 [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Degasperis, L. Fonda, G. Ghirardi. Does the lifetime of an unstable system depend on the measuring apparatus? Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970), 21, 471 (1974) [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Snizhko, P. Kumar, A. Romito. Quantum zeno effect appears in stages. Phys. Rev. Res., 2, 033512 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Biella, M. Schiró. Many-Body Quantum Zeno Effect and Measurement-Induced Subradiance Transition. Quantum, 5, 528 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Lami, A. Santini, M. Collura. Continuously monitored quantum systems beyond lindblad dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.04108 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Li, X. Chen, A.W.W. Ludwig, M.P.A. Fisher. Conformal invariance and quantum nonlocality in critical hybrid circuits. Phys. Rev. B, 104, 104305 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Szyniszewski, A. Romito, H. Schomerus. Universality of entanglement transitions from stroboscopic to continuous measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125, 210602 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Li, X. Chen, M.P.A. Fisher. Quantum zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition. Phys. Rev. B, 98, 205136 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, J. Haah. Quantum entanglement growth under random unitary dynamics. Phys. Rev. X, 7, 031016 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, A. Nahum. Measurement-induced phase transitions in the dy-namics of entanglement. Phys. Rev. X, 9, 031009 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Bao, S. Choi, E. Altman. Theory of the phase transition in random unitary circuits with measurements. Phys. Rev. B, 101, 104301 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Chan, R.M. Nandkishore, M. Pretko, G. Smith. Unitary-projective entanglement dynamics. Phys. Rev. B, 99, 224307 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  14. X. Cao, A. Tilloy, A.D. Luca. Entanglement in a fermion chain under continuous mon-itoring. SciPost Phys., 7, 024 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Coppola, E. Tirrito, D. Karevski, M. Collura. Growth of entanglement entropy under local projective measurements. Phys. Rev. B, 105, 094303 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Russomanno, G. Piccitto, D. Rossini. Entanglement transitions and quantum bifur-cations under continuous long-range monitoring. Phys. Rev. B, 108, 104313 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Lumia, E. Tirrito, R. Fazio, M. Collura. Measurement-induced transitions beyond gaussianity: a single particle description. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09043 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Tirrito, A. Santini, R. Fazio, M. Collura. Full counting statistics as probe of measurement-induced transitions in the quantum Ising chain. SciPost Phys., 15, 096 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Piccitto, A. Russomanno, D. Rossini. Entanglement transitions in the quantum ising chain: A comparison between different unravelings of the same lindbladian. Phys. Rev. B, 105, 064305 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  20. J.C. Hoke, M. Ippoliti, D.A. Abanin, R. Acharya, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A.T. Asfaw, J. Atalaya, J.C. Bardin et al. Measurement-induced entanglement and telepor-tation on a noisy quantum processor. Nature, 622, 481 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  21. T.J. Elliott, W. Kozlowski, S.F. Caballero-Benitez, I.B. Mekhov. Multipartite entangled spatial modes of ultracold atoms generated and controlled by quantum measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114, 113604 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Noel, P. Niroula, D. Zhu, A. Risinger, L. Egan, D. Biswas, M. Cetina, A.V. Gorshkov, M.J. Gullans, D.A. Huse et al. Measurement-induced quantum phases realized in a trapped-ion quantum computer. Nature Physics, 18, 760 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Sierant, G. Chiriacò, F.M. Surace, S. Sharma, X. Turkeshi, M. Dalmonte, R. Fazio, G. Pagano. Dissipative Floquet Dynamics: from Steady State to Measurement Induced Criticality in Trapped-ion Chains. Quantum, 6, 638 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Fava, L. Piroli, T. Swann, D. Bernard, A. Nahum. Nonlinear sigma models for monitored dynamics of free fermions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.12820 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Giachetti, A. De Luca. Elusive phase transition in the replica limit of monitored systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.12166 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  26. P. Pöpperl, I.V. Gornyi, D.B. Saakian, O.M. Yevtushenko. Localization, fractality, and ergodicity in a monitored qubit. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01997 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  27. H. Ha, A. Pandey, S. Gopalakrishnan, D.A. Huse, Measurement-induced phase transi-tions in systems with diffusive dynamics (2024), 2405.08861 [Google Scholar]
  28. A.R. Negari, S. Sahu, T.H. Hsieh. Measurement-induced phase transitions in the toric code. Phys. Rev. B, 109, 125148 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  29. H.M. Wiseman, G.J. Milburn, Quantum Measurement and Control (Cambridge Univer-sity Press, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  30. J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Goldstine Printed Materials (Princeton University Press, 1955), ISBN 9780691028934 [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Aspelmeyer, T.J. Kippenberg, F. Marquardt. Cavity optomechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys., 86, 1391 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  32. R.B. Griffiths, Quantum Channels, Kraus Operators, POVMs (2010), https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:8114999 [Google Scholar]
  33. J.S. Bell. On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox. Physics Physique Fizika, 1, 195 (1964) [Google Scholar]
  34. C. Chou, H. Riedmatten, D. Felinto, S. Polyakov, S. van Enk, H. Kimble. Measurement-induced entanglement for excitation stored in remote atomic ensembles. Nature, 438, 828 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Hsu, Decoherence and quantum measurement: The missing lecture (2022) [Google Scholar]
  36. E. Bianchi, L. Hackl, M. Kieburg, M. Rigol, L. Vidmar. Volume-law entanglement entropy of typical pure quantum states. PRX Quantum, 3, 030201 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  37. J. Eisert, M. Cramer, M.B. Plenio. Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy. Rev. Mod. Phys., 82, 277 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  38. J.T. Chayes, L. Chayes, R. Durrett. Critical behavior of the two-dimensional first pas-sage time. Journal of statistical physics, 45, 933 (1986) [Google Scholar]
  39. A.A. Mele. Introduction to Haar Measure Tools in Quantum Information: A Beginner’s Tutorial. Quantum, 8, 1340 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  40. G. Köstenberger, Weingarten calculus (2021), 2101.00921 [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Stephen. Percolation problems and the potts model. Physics Letters A, 56, 149 (1976) [Google Scholar]
  42. S.J. Garratt, Z. Weinstein, E. Altman, Measurements conspire nonlocally to restructure critical quantum states (2022), 2207.09476 [Google Scholar]
  43. X. Feng, B. Skinner, A. Nahum. Measurement-induced phase transitions on dynamical quantum trees. PRX Quantum, 4, 030333 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  44. R. Wiersema, C. Zhou, J.F. Carrasquilla, Y.B. Kim. Measurement-induced entangle-ment phase transitions in variational quantum circuits. SciPost Phys., 14, 147 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  45. T.J. Hollowood, Renormalization Group and Fixed Points: in Quantum Field Theory (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013), ISBN 9783642363122, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36312-2 [Google Scholar]
  46. T. Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Oxford University Press, 2003), ISBN 9780198525004, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525004.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  47. F.D.M. Haldane. ’luttinger liquid theory’ of one-dimensional quantum fluids. i. prop-erties of the luttinger model and their extension to the general 1d interacting spinless fermi gas. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 14, 2585 (1981) [Google Scholar]
  48. A.O. Caldeira, A.J. Leggett. Influence of dissipation on quantum tunneling in macro-scopic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 46, 211 (1981) [Google Scholar]
  49. M. Cianciaruso, S.M. Giampaolo, W. Roga, G. Zonzo, M. Blasone, F. Illuminati, En-tanglement and quantum correlations in many-body systems: a unified approach via local unitary operations (2015), 1412.1054 [Google Scholar]
  50. S.K. Jian, C. Liu, X. Chen, B. Swingle, P. Zhang. Measurement-induced phase transi-tion in the monitored sachdev-ye-kitaev model. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127, 140601 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  51. T. Minato, K. Sugimoto, T. Kuwahara, K. Saito. Fate of measurement-induced phase transition in long-range interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 128, 010603 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  52. S. Aaronson. Quantum computing, postselection, and probabilistic polynomial-time. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 461, 3473–3482 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  53. J. Preskill. Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2, 79 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.